Inspired Radio, May 13, 2026
Inspired Radio with Helen Taylor
Guests, Peter and Donna, Corruption Whistleblowers
Unveiling the "Concealed Colony": Banking Corruption and the Quest for Australian Sovereignty
In this episode of Inspired Radio, host Helen Taylor interviews Peter and Donna from Corruption Whistleblower. The discussion exposes a massive alleged financial fraud involving the "Alpha Omega Trust" and challenges the legal legitimacy of the Australian government, claiming the nation has been operating as an unlawful "criminal cartel" since 1920.
Detailed Summary of Key Findings
1. The Trillion-Dollar Banking Fraud
According to documents recovered by the guests, nine major Australian banks, including the Reserve Bank, were entrusted with trillions of dollars in 1966 and 1967 under the Alpha Omega Trust. This capital was intended to be held for 30 years, with 50% of the generated interest distributed to the Australian people starting around 1997. Peter and Donna assert that these funds remain hidden on "hidden ledgers," and they are currently preparing a court case to force the return of these assets to the public.
The Scarcity Engine: How Money is Created
Peter explains the "Fiat" mechanism that drives modern debt enslavement:
- The Promise: Loans are created via "promissory notes" (Bills of Exchange).
- The Gap: Banks issue the Principal but never create the Interest currency.
- The Result: Interest can only be paid through inflation or broken loans (repossessions), meaning the system is mathematically programmed for failure.
2. The Constitutional "Incineration" of 1919
A central argument of the interview is that Australia became a fully sovereign, independent nation-state following the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. Peter claims that the blood sacrifice of over 60,000 soldiers in WWI earned Australia its international personality, effectively making the UK Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 redundant on Australian soil. They argue that by continuing to use a UK Act, the current government acts as a "foreign power" or "territorialist" regime that lacks true jurisdiction over the land.
3. International Law and the "Criminal Cartel"
The guests highlight Article 10 and Article 18 of the League of Nations Covenant (and later UN Charter Articles 2 and 102), which prohibit political interference in the territorial integrity of sovereign members. They contend that Australian officials, by swearing allegiance to the British Monarch rather than the sovereign Australian people, are committing "war crimes" and acts of aggression against their own populace. They are currently finalizing a 400-page affidavit to be submitted to international bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Legal Legitimacy Timeline
4. The Path Forward: Secession and New Constitutions
The conversation touches on growing movements for change, including the potential secession of Western Australia (WA). Intellectuals and professionals are reportedly calculating how the nation could thrive by removing "65% of the bureaucracy" and retaining local resources. Peter and Donna emphasize that they are not "sovereign citizens"—a label they reject as a government distraction—but rather people seeking to hold the "de facto" administration accountable to international law.
Key Data & Indicators
- WWI Casualties: 60,720 deaths and 155,000 wounded, cited as the "blood sacrifice" for Australian independence.
- UN Donations: Australia allegedly donates $5 billion annually to UN programs without sufficient domestic accountability.
- CEO Salaries: Major bank CEOs are noted to be earning approximately **
10millionperyear∗∗(800,000/month) while the public faces financial scarcity.
- Affidavit Status: A 400-page evidentiary document is currently in the "proofreading and tidying" phase for international submission.
To-Do / Next Steps
- Submit Victim Impact Statements: Individuals harmed by unlawful repossessions, family court failures, or government overreach are urged to download the template from the website and post the original to the guests.
- Review Evidence: Listeners are encouraged to visit corruptionwhistleblower.com to view the "Alpha Omega Trust" documents and historical parliamentary records.
- Educational Reading: Read The Concealed Colony as a foundational text to understand the legal arguments presented in the interview.
- Monitor International Filings: Watch for updates regarding the submission of the 400-page affidavit to the ICC and ICJ.
Conclusion
The interview presents a radical re-interpretation of Australian history and law, framing the current administrative structure as a bankrupt "banking system" rather than a legitimate government. By combining historical treaties with modern financial whistleblowing, Peter and Donna aim to trigger a "military-style" accountability process that restores the nation's wealth and sovereignty to its people.
Inspired Radio
Please help support this show!
Support this show by subscribing
$5.99/mo or $9.99/mo or more
Click HERE
BREAKING FREE FROM LIMITING SYSTEMS AND EMBRACING OUR INFINITE POTENTIAL – WELCOME TO INSPIRED RADIO with Helen Taylor.
This is where souls come together for inspiring conversations that open hearts, shift perspectives and spark real change.
On Inspired Radio we explore new and uncharted ways of building, thinking, loving, and relating. It’s about embracing the discomfort of transformation and collectively creating Heaven on Earth.
Each week, my guests share their stories, powerful journeys of overcoming change and stepping into a better life. Through storytelling, we connect deeply, learn from one another and ignite the courage to walk our own path.
This show embodies the spirit of love, respect, and compassion. Join us for authentic conversations that will inspire you to live more freely, more fully and more connected.
INSPIRED RADIO with Helen Taylor – Because change begins with a conversation.
00:02
Speaker 1
All right. Good afternoon, Melbourne, good afternoon, Australia, and good day or evening to all our international listeners, too. I'm Helen Taylor. Welcome to my show, Inspired Radio. I'm here with you every Wednesday, 12:00 P.M. Melbourne, Australia time, and Tuesday, 7:00 P.M. Central Time, for Canada and U.S., for conversations and stories to inspire you. This is the BBS Radio TV platform, and we're going live to over 200 outlets worldwide. Before I get started, sponsors. Thank you, sponsors. Thank you for everybody that helps to keep this show going. You are part of the foundation. Thank you very much. Inspired Radio is all about change, getting uncomfortable, and shaking up the status quo, because we're breaking free from limiting systems and limiting lives, and we're embracing our infinite potential. My guests are here to tell you how they're doing it. So let me introduce the guests today. I've got Donna and Peter here from Corruption Whistleblower.
01:07
Speaker 1
We're diving into a story that's raising big questions. They have uncovered serious wrongdoing within Australia's banking system, and they've been through hell, facing obstacles, pressure, threats, but they haven't stopped, no matter what. I last introduced them or interviewed them on the 15th of December, and they're back to share with us with what's been happening since, what's been unfolding. So let's have a conversation, and then you can decide for yourselves. Peter and Donna, thank you so much for joining me again. Welcome.
01:43
Speaker 2
You're welcome. Thank you very much.
01:44
Speaker 3
Yes. Thanks, Helen, for having us on your great radio station. And thank you to all the viewers for giving us their time and listening.
01:51
Speaker 1
Absolutely.
01:51
Speaker 3
It's-
01:51
Speaker 1
Listen up, everybody.
01:53
Speaker 2
Very grateful.
01:53
Speaker 1
Listen up. This is good conversation and good information. So we spoke about, in December last year, you were serving the banks. Can you give us a recap of what was happening then for the people?
02:06
Speaker 3
Yeah, sure. I can, uh, do the recap, and then Peter could, usually picks up when I run out of recapping.
02:11
Speaker 1
Yeah. (laughs)
02:13
Speaker 3
He's the more in-depth guy, you know. So yes, we did serve them a final notice of demand that, uh, came from all of the trillions that they do owe the people, 'cause as- as we'll just touch on what was supposed to happen, they were given, you know, ANZ Bank, all the top banks, it was about nine banks, including the Reserve Bank, were given, uh, trillions and trillions of dollars each, hundreds of thousands. It's all in the documents on corruptionwhistleblower.com. You'll see the, uh, fine tuning of those documents, and, uh, the detailed amounts that they were actually given in, uh, 1966 and 1967. Now they were supposed to keep that for 30 years. This is under the Alpha Omega Trust.
02:53
Speaker 1
For the people.
02:53
Speaker 3
And then they were suppo- Yeah. And so then they were supposed to have interest on that for 30 years, and 50% of that interest was supposed to go to the people in, say, around 1997.
03:04
Speaker 1
Yeah.
03:04
Speaker 3
But clearly that didn't happen.
03:06
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
03:06
Speaker 3
So, you know, now we're near- we're pretty much up to another 30 years, so they're supposed to do their second job of money on the people, and that still hasn't happened, and they're hiding the funds or they don't know they're there. They've got them on hidden ledgers. But we do- we have received other documents, even after we've served them, that show that the funds have gone into their accounts.
03:27
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
03:27
Speaker 3
So now we're gathering together a court case and waiting just for a few more documents to come in so that we can start to, uh, put it through court. Would you wanna say about that?
03:37
Speaker 2
Yeah. So we're- we're- we'll be chasing a court order for them to return the funds to the original bank accounts. Um, there already is a current court order out of the US for them to do so, but because we know our court system here are absolutely compromised, there's no question about that, absolutely compromised.
03:59
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
03:59
Speaker 2
Uh, we have to go through the processes, 'cause we don't want the banks, um, saying i- and the reason why we've been delaying is 'cause we're waiting for a couple of documents, and we don't want to give the banks the opportunity to say or request a re- court order for the originating source of the funds. Even though there is that current court order out of, uh, America, um, requiring them to put the funds in over there. So we need our own court order here, because we know that they'll probably ignore it and say, "Well, that's an international order. You haven't got jurisdiction here." It does. So once we, uh, get this last few pieces of paper or documents, um, nailing down the original source of funds, 'cause we've got the documents that show the transactions.
04:47
Speaker 1
Well, that's what I wanted to say. You've got... This is all, for everybody listening, this is- this evi- this is evidence-backed. All of it is-
04:53
Speaker 2
Absolutely.
04:54
Speaker 1
... evidence-backed. Yes.
04:55
Speaker 2
Yes. Yeah, look, we, as the Corruption Whistleblowers, we only write briefs of evidence. We don't fuck around with anything that's untrue. Everything has to be proven.
05:04
Speaker 1
Sure.
05:04
Speaker 2
Um, and so anyway, so that's- that's the process at hand at the moment. So we're waiting for that to take place, and it's getting closer and closer. So once we get those final documents, uh, we'll be filing them into the courts, uh, requesting a court order that they return the funds, and we'll see what they do. Um, but what we think will happen is the banks will most likely, if we can get any justice in this nation, but they will most likely break, they, without putting too much information there, they'll probably break. Uh, and the original funders of the banks will hopefully take over those banks, and then that money can go to the people who it was supposed to go to, instead of them making money a scarcity when it's actually an abundance of money in this world.
05:53
Speaker 1
Yep.
05:53
Speaker 2
Uh, and then things will slowly but surely tip over. But that's- that's roughly where we're at with the- the money at this point. And like I said, there's already court orders.
06:03
Speaker 1
Yep.
06:03
Speaker 2
There's a number of them around the world, but we need our own here so we can get it reinforced here, because these bankers are, like many other people in the system-... totally untrustworthy. Like, we've got the CEOs paying themselves $10 million a year, and if you can get your head around that-
06:19
Speaker 1
Yeah.
06:19
Speaker 2
... it's, it's $800,000 a month. It's a ridiculous amount of money.
06:22
Speaker 1
Yup.
06:23
Speaker 2
And the current system relies on... Like, not many people know where money actually i- or how it's created.
06:31
Speaker 1
Yup.
06:31
Speaker 2
And for those that do know, they will surely know if they've done a bit of research that it comes from the bills of exchange. We make a promise to pay to the banks on our loans, that goes on their ledger, and then they give it back to us. So, the m- the money's uncommercialized, but we only receive principal. That is the actual creation of money under the current fiat system.
06:53
Speaker 1
Well, $1, $1's been used a trillion times over and over and over. Like, you know?
06:59
Speaker 2
Mm-hmm.
06:59
Speaker 1
If people just get that idea that the same thing's being traded over and over again, the foundation of it would just collapse.
07:07
Speaker 2
Well, it's actually worse than that, because they make money a scarcity, and it may be a little bit harder for your listeners to get their head around this, 'cause it is a little bit difficult sometimes. But when you make a loan application, that's a promissory note under the bills of exchange.
07:23
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
07:24
Speaker 2
That goes on their ledger, they then give you back the loan amount, the principal, so everybody's receiving the principal amount. So, if money creation come from promissory notes, where does the interest currency come from?
07:37
Speaker 1
Yup.
07:37
Speaker 2
That's the trigger. That's the biggest thing, and that's what enslaves us, is that the interest currency can only come from inflation, which our houses and our, our things go up every year, so that's like increased value in the market, in the monetary system. Or it can only come from other people's broken loans. I take a loan for a $100,000 BMW or Mercedes-Benz. I fail to pay that loan, the loan gets re-auctioned off, but the, the principal's gone to the, the, the reseller, or the car yard. He's paid his workers, he's paid his home loan, he's paid all his stuff with it. He's paid for his child's going to school and whatever. The car gets repossessed, gets sold for 50 grand, so if you can imagine that, 50,000 from that loan is flushed into the system. And that's where our interest currency comes from. It comes from broken loans, can you believe it?
08:29
Speaker 2
So-
08:30
Speaker 1
Right, right. Yeah.
08:31
Speaker 2
It's-
08:31
Speaker 1
The system is programmed for people to fail.
08:34
Speaker 2
That's right. And, and never are they releasing the interest, so makes money a scarcity.
08:40
Speaker 1
Yup, sure. Wow, and what I hear with the banking, you're waiting for a couple of documents so you can lock them in tighter, so there's no room for them to... Well, no wiggle room, I suppose.
08:52
Speaker 2
That's right.
08:53
Speaker 1
Yeah.
08:53
Speaker 2
That's right, yeah.
08:54
Speaker 1
Because we know how these court systems work. They just keep either changing jurisdiction, changing different kind of concepts, and wiggling them- their ways out of things.
09:04
Speaker 2
That's right. Well, the courts are actually owned by the banks, if you drill down deep enough, but that's another conversation. But they absolutely are. It's a banking system.
09:13
Speaker 1
Yes. I've heard that many times, that it's a banking system. Yeah, I get it. I get it. All right. So, thank you. That's where you're at at the moment, is just... And for everyone listening as well, this, as you've been alluding to, it's not just happening here in Australia. This theft is worldwide, for all the countries-
09:29
Speaker 2
Absolutely.
09:29
Speaker 1
... around the world, so there's more Donners and Peters everywhere, dotted around the world.
09:35
Speaker 3
There is. There is. They're starting to serve the banks in the other nations now.
09:38
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
09:39
Speaker 3
And they just sent us through a template today, and, and so this is what they're using, pretty much our template, 'cause Australia was the first one to do this move.
09:47
Speaker 1
Okay.
09:47
Speaker 3
So, pretty much the template that we created-
09:51
Speaker 1
Yup.
09:51
Speaker 3
... to, uh, hold them to task-
09:53
Speaker 1
Yup.
09:53
Speaker 3
... is, uh, now going around the world. And so, more banksters are being served and-
09:58
Speaker 1
Wow.
09:58
Speaker 3
... and, and hopefully we can... Yeah, yeah, so it's good.
10:01
Speaker 1
Can I just, can I just, while we're on that topic, from the whole world, say thank you to both of you-
10:06
Speaker 3
Okay.
10:06
Speaker 1
... for the hard work that you've done, and for creating that template? Everybody needs to know that it started here, right? It started with you two.
10:15
Speaker 2
Yeah, it did.
10:15
Speaker 3
Yeah.
10:15
Speaker 1
It started here in Australia. Thank you. Thank you very-
10:18
Speaker 3
Thank you very much, Shelley. Yeah.
10:19
Speaker 2
You're welcome. It's our duty, really it is.
10:21
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
10:22
Speaker 3
Yeah, very much. So, that's all the Alpha Omega Trust. If you want to know more, the videos are up on corruptionwhistleblower.com.
10:28
Speaker 1
Yes.
10:29
Speaker 3
And the real, the thing that really comes to mind when I think about our website is the victim impact statement, so-
10:36
Speaker 1
Yeah.
10:36
Speaker 3
... how has this affected you? How, how has, you know, not having, um, being able to, to pay a loan off, where you lose your house, you, you lose your family, is like, it can be such a, an ongoing, uh, calamity in your life-
10:51
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
10:51
Speaker 3
... when they come and interview and try and take your house or things don't go so well. So, um, yeah, please put your victim impact statements... If you've had your children taken or you've had your home unlawfully repossessed, which is all the loans are unlawful. (laughs)
11:06
Speaker 1
(laughs)
11:06
Speaker 2
Yeah.
11:06
Speaker 3
And you, or you've been harmed and affected by the current, uh, criminal cartel called the Australian Government regime, we would like to hear from you on the victim impact statement. And there is a template there-
11:18
Speaker 1
Thank you.
11:18
Speaker 3
... for you to fill-
11:19
Speaker 1
Thank you.
11:19
Speaker 3
... in your books on that.
11:20
Speaker 1
'Cause I was looking at that on your website and wondering what that was about, so thank you for the insight. So, anybody that's been affected in-
11:27
Speaker 3
Mm-hmm.
11:27
Speaker 1
... any of those ways you're talking about can go to your website, download it and, and fill it, fill it out, and then submit it. Yeah?
11:36
Speaker 2
Uh, yeah. Uh, post us the original.
11:39
Speaker 1
Yeah.
11:39
Speaker 2
Uh, all the details are on that site. And that'll be part of an international court ruling soon enough.
11:45
Speaker 1
Yeah.
11:45
Speaker 2
We can't disclose too much about that, but that's where it's heading.
11:48
Speaker 1
And if everybody's looking at ways that they can be a part of this, there's a way.
11:52
Speaker 3
That's right, yeah.
11:53
Speaker 2
That's right, yes. That's right.
11:54
Speaker 3
Very much, very much. We've been working on about a 400-page affidavit at the moment-
12:00
Speaker 1
Yep.
12:00
Speaker 3
... exposing-
12:01
Speaker 1
I can do that.
12:01
Speaker 3
... the criminal cartel that, um, that professes to run Australia, that really just running Australia into the ground.
12:09
Speaker 1
Yup.
12:09
Speaker 3
So, we're all quite aware of, of what's, what's happening, and, and the unlawful, uh, cartel that's running us. So, we've, uh, proceeded to, uh-... to bring up key points in history that show that we have an unlawful and invalid, um, criminal cartel running the nation.
12:30
Speaker 1
Yep.
12:31
Speaker 3
And, uh, we'd like to just spend some time unpacking that with you.
12:34
Speaker 1
Please, please. It's, I- I love the language as well, because you know, it's only just recently that people have been naming it for what it is, which is a criminal cartel. If anybody just actually, you know, realiz- recognized that we- everyone knows what the mafia is. Well, just think of that. Just think of that playing around in the background running your country.
12:56
Speaker 3
Hmm.
12:56
Speaker 2
It is.
12:57
Speaker 3
Yeah.
12:57
Speaker 2
It's actually, uh, yes, it is. Australia is a crime scene.
13:00
Speaker 1
Mm.
13:01
Speaker 3
Yeah.
13:01
Speaker 1
I love the way-
13:02
Speaker 2
So just-
13:03
Speaker 1
... the lang- the language and the whole kind of-
13:06
Speaker 3
(laughs)
13:06
Speaker 1
... the whole, the whole playing field is starting to really open up and change.
13:11
Speaker 2
It is.
13:12
Speaker 1
All right.
13:12
Speaker 3
I'll just share screen-
13:13
Speaker 1
While I-
13:13
Speaker 3
... while we're chatting.
13:14
Speaker 1
Yeah, yeah, please, please. And for those listening, we're sharing screen at the moment, so, um, I really, you know, uh, you just look on my socials and you'll get the, uh, the videos as well so that you can have a look. Um, tell me why... So what is, what is, um-
13:30
Speaker 3
Ah.
13:30
Speaker 1
... the- the point of putting this affidavit together?
13:35
Speaker 3
Oh, yeah. Peter's good at talking. I can talk if you want, but Peter's usually quite good at articulating this whole-
13:40
Speaker 2
Well-
13:40
Speaker 3
... the whole point of it.
13:41
Speaker 1
You two toss a coin. You two toss a coin. Tell me who's gonna do it. (laughs)
13:44
Speaker 2
Well, it's part, it's part of a, uh, international court submission.
13:48
Speaker 1
Right.
13:49
Speaker 2
We've already given it to a few people internationally. They said, "100% you're correct." Um, so we just... We can't disclose too much about the actions and the times of this happening right at this time, but-
14:04
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
14:04
Speaker 2
... this is part of it, and once we get, uh, some reports on this affidavit, professional reports, and we were actually just made a... sent an email yesterday to get one of them. But we're getting international reports as well. We'll then give this affidavit and all the reports to file into everybody's court case. So what that'll demonstrate is that there's no law here, and it's as simple as that.
14:27
Speaker 1
So if something-
14:29
Speaker 2
So-
14:29
Speaker 1
... if somebody's got a, uh, a court case going, this, this affidavit can be relied on as evidence for a-
14:35
Speaker 2
Not yet.
14:35
Speaker 1
... any, any-
14:36
Speaker 2
Not yet. We just, we- we got to get the international ruling.
14:39
Speaker 3
That's right.
14:39
Speaker 1
Yeah.
14:39
Speaker 2
Eventually. It's probably about three or four... three months away.
14:42
Speaker 1
Okay.
14:42
Speaker 2
Uh, and so, but it'll also come with, um, you know, a good handful of reports to say that it's true and correct from internationally, uh, high level lawyers and United Nation, uh, executives.
14:56
Speaker 1
Okay. Okay.
14:57
Speaker 3
That's very insightful of you, Helen, to figure that out. That's exactly right.
15:01
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
15:01
Speaker 3
It can be used in, in, uh, court matters. Um, but still, we... Uh, not to get, uh, people who are criminals off is... 'Cause it still do no harm. We still e- eventually fall back under, you know, at the, at the moment, international law and, um, you know, uh, and, and common law really.
15:19
Speaker 1
Yes.
15:19
Speaker 3
But, uh, yeah. We'll, we'll just track through this a bit.
15:22
Speaker 2
Can we go to the-
15:23
Speaker 1
And that's-
15:23
Speaker 2
... to Billy G's father?
15:24
Speaker 3
That's good that you just brought that up too, because you know, we've had about 20 odd years, I know in my own experience, where people have been trying to, you know, um, pick apart the Constitution, pick apart our- our legal system, pick apart all sorts of different things. But now we're getting clearer, aren't we?
15:41
Speaker 2
Absolutely.
15:41
Speaker 3
It just incinerates it. There's no picking apart anymore.
15:44
Speaker 1
Oh, I love that word incinerate.
15:47
Speaker 2
(laughs)
15:47
Speaker 1
And look, everybody listening-
15:49
Speaker 3
(laughs)
15:49
Speaker 1
... you... This is something these guys have not revealed this yet, have you?
15:53
Speaker 3
No.
15:53
Speaker 2
No.
15:53
Speaker 3
We have not.
15:54
Speaker 1
This is the first time that they're revealing the draft of what this is about. So some little bits and pieces.
15:59
Speaker 3
Yes.
15:59
Speaker 1
So listen up. Please share with us.
16:02
Speaker 2
Yeah.
16:02
Speaker 1
Go ahead.
16:02
Speaker 2
So there, there are some people in the country, a small handful, that are fully aware of this.
16:07
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
16:08
Speaker 2
Uh, especially the Constitution. So they're, they're aware of it, but they... The constitutionalists and, uh, like I said, I think on the last time, we love them. But the thing is, you got to get your argument right. They're true warriors, these people who are battling with the Constitution.
16:21
Speaker 1
Sure.
16:22
Speaker 2
Uh, the Constitution was re- made redundant, uh, in 1919 at the sacrifice of 60,000 odd, uh, of our military's lives. So our freedom was born on the sac- on a blood sacrifice. And these Constitutionals have got to realize that if you are in a bird cage and someone opens the cage and says, "You can all fly out," you don't all, all flap around in there and say, "Well, let's have a referendum to see if we can fly out the door," because we were given freedom. And it was an international agreement. The United Kingdom Parliament took part in the Treaty of Versailles or the Treaty of Peace and signed it. Australia signed it. So at that moment, that made the Constitution Act 1900 of UK invalid and unlawful to use on the land mass known as Australia.
17:15
Speaker 1
Right.
17:15
Speaker 2
And it's been written into international law. And once again, the constitutional, constitutionalists will say, "Oh, we need a referendum." No, because the, the Constitution Act 1900 UK is owned by the UK Parliament. So if the UK Parliament go to the Treaty of Versailles with the Australian Parliament and sign an agreement, and we'll get to Section 10 of the Treaty of Versailles in a minute, and it clearly says there each of the other members are not allowed to politically interfere on the territorial rights of any of the other members.
17:50
Speaker 1
Okay.
17:50
Speaker 2
Which means the Constitution Act cannot survive here anymore.
17:53
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
17:53
Speaker 3
Because it's an act of the UK Parliament.
17:56
Speaker 1
Yeah.
17:56
Speaker 3
It's an act of the... So it's a foreign nation that's enforcing-
18:00
Speaker 1
So it cannot interfere with any other nation.
18:03
Speaker 3
But it-
18:03
Speaker 2
Correct.
18:03
Speaker 3
And it's interfering with our nation.
18:05
Speaker 2
Right.
18:05
Speaker 3
Because it's, it's... And of course, when you break it down, the United Kingdom and the people who swear their allegiance to the, the king in the United Kingdom and, and the King of Australia, if they swear their allegiance to that, well, then their allegiance is not here.
18:19
Speaker 1
Yes.
18:19
Speaker 3
Their allegiance is, is to the foreign nation.
18:22
Speaker 1
Another country. Mm-hmm.Hmm.
18:23
Speaker 3
Correct.
18:24
Speaker 1
... that have given themselves immunity- Yes
18:26
Speaker 3
... to a certain extent.
18:28
Speaker 2
So if you can see this page that we've got up here, you can see the signatories of Billy Hughes and, um, (smacks lips) uh, what was his name? Uh, Cook and-
18:40
Speaker 1
Joseph Cook.
18:40
Speaker 2
... Joseph Cook. And one of the people that went to the treat- signing of the Treaty of Versailles, which will make plenipotentiaries, uh, was, believe it or not, one of the guys that wrote the Constitution, which was Garran. Uh, it was, the Constitution was written under, by Quick and Garran, well, Garran was here at the signing of this Treaty of Versailles. And so you've even got the people who wrote the Constitution going over there, sitting with the British Parliament, the owners of the Constitution, saying they cannot use that Constitution, uh, in Australia anymore under international law. And we're gonna proceed a little bit further now, and we're gonna show you, 'cause we'll try and get through this, 'cause there's a lot of information here.
19:21
Speaker 1
Yeah.
19:21
Speaker 2
But we'll try and get through the critical part.
19:23
Speaker 1
Hey, hey, and for everybody out there, can you hear Peter's passion? My gosh. (laughs (laughs)
19:28
Speaker 1
We're really, we're really on a topic that hits close to his heart. Go, Peter. You've got the floor.
19:34
Speaker 2
Yeah. Sure. So, um, it, so they, everybody went over. There were 32 nations that originally signed the Treaty of Peace at Versailles, and they all agreed and signed the document, which was part of the Covenant of the League of Nations, which was written into international law on around the 10th of January, uh, 1920. And-
19:58
Speaker 1
So this is after World War I, isn't it? So-
20:00
Speaker 3
Yeah. That's, they're the ones who died, so that they're talking about the men and the servicewomen. It wasn't even our war.
20:06
Speaker 1
Yeah.
20:06
Speaker 3
We were dragged into it.
20:07
Speaker 1
Yeah.
20:07
Speaker 3
It was the British war. It wa- uh, you know, we were dragged in, uh, on behalf of the British. So then they said, "Well, okay, enough servicemen and women have shed their blood." 66,000 or more died, and 155,000 were wounded, and they said, "This gives you your sovereign, independent nation status." And we break away, and we had our own international personality. And which, as it goes on into this page, was then brought back and fully ratified through our parliament, celebrated and acknowledged in the streets.
20:37
Speaker 1
Right. Gotcha. Gotcha.
20:40
Speaker 2
But then they, they've hidden it and continued the Constitution after that.
20:44
Speaker 1
Wow.
20:44
Speaker 2
And so that was, that was a major problem. But as we proceed through the document, I'm sure you've heard the rumors about the Queen of Australia and so on, so forth.
20:54
Speaker 1
Yes.
20:54
Speaker 2
See, after the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, they worked out that the Queen could no longer reign over this place, so they had to change her title, and they changed it a, a few times. So you've got the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1953, and then you've got the Royal Styles and Titles Act of 1973.
21:12
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
21:12
Speaker 2
But however, we'll, we'll just stick with the Treaty of Peace at the moment.
21:16
Speaker 1
Sure.
21:16
Speaker 2
And so the founding document to the League of Nations, or the Covenant of the League of Nations was inside that signing of the Treaty of Peace. There were, uh, 46 members, I believe, in total in the League of Nations. Unfortunately, they couldn't stop World War II, so that then became, you know, was amalgamated into the United Nations, which now there is 196 members, so it became a much powerful a force.
21:43
Speaker 2
But here you can see-
21:45
Speaker 1
This one.
21:46
Speaker 2
... the Treaty of Peace, um, yeah. So, look, the actions of Hughes and Cook were written into Australian law by unanasm- unanimously approved, uh, Treaty of Peace on the 28th of October, 1919. The Australian Prime Minister advises the Australian people of the achie- achievement of nationhood.
22:07
Speaker 1
Yes. Yes.
22:08
Speaker 3
And s- so you can see here on the screen, this is the actual Treaty of Peace, which was approved by then the governor general. So there should've been, at that time, a transition or a new constitution written. But eventually the thing got tired and sort of ran out of steam, and they didn't do it, because the British monarchy, which i- which we call the British territorialists-
22:32
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
22:32
Speaker 3
... have ha- have had, you know, underpinning forces here in this country, particularly within the Labor government and the Liberal government, mainly the Labor government, that were, wanted to maintain their power, and they did that. And so they-
22:48
Speaker 1
That answers my question, because I'm thinking, "Well, if it was brought here to Australia, and it was announced, then why didn't it go ahead?" And what you're saying is, because there were factions underpinning it and not wanting it to happen.
23:01
Speaker 2
That's correct.
23:02
Speaker 1
Okay.
23:02
Speaker 2
That, uh, correct. So in this document, and we won't go too in depth in them, but they, they are actually the speech readings from Parliament, uh, you know, where they read it all out, approved it all.
23:12
Speaker 1
Yep.
23:13
Speaker 2
Um, and even had agreements with new financing and, and those sorts of things with the British. 'Cause the British could no longer then after then give us a command.
23:23
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
23:23
Speaker 2
It was up to our par- own parliament to, uh, create, uh, you know, documents to say that, "Yeah, we w- we will join you, but if you want us to join you in another war, then you have to fund us for it."
23:36
Speaker 1
And we had the power at that point. We had the power to be able to do that and set the rules ourselves.
23:41
Speaker 3
Well, listen to this fact that we've got in here, and we have many of them.
23:45
Speaker 1
Yep.
23:45
Speaker 3
History clearly records that under international law, with the consent and approval of King George V and the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the owners of the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK, Australia transmuted from being a British colony and dominion under the monarch and under the sovereignty of the United Kingdom-
24:06
Speaker 2
Mm-hmm.
24:08
Speaker 3
... to a p- to a, uh, politically autonomous, unincorporated sovereign Commonwealth of Australia-
24:17
Speaker 1
Wow.
24:17
Speaker 3
... independent nation state where we're centered, it was ratified, it was put-
24:22
Speaker 1
Yep.
24:22
Speaker 3
... through all our parliaments. It was in-
24:24
Speaker 1
Yep.
24:24
Speaker 3
... all of our... Ev- it just got celebrated, because like Peter's saying, we're supposed to write a new constitution, become our own nation, all of this kind of stuff.
24:33
Speaker 1
Yep.
24:33
Speaker 3
We really only used the Constitution 1900 for 20 years.
24:36
Speaker 1
Yeah.
24:36
Speaker 3
And then it was d- it was, uh, it was defunct. It become mute, and it, it, um, didn't represent the Australian people.
24:45
Speaker 1
Yes.
24:45
Speaker 3
And so therefore we were then ruled over by a foreign nation, which-
24:49
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
24:49
Speaker 3
... was supposed to be corrected.
24:52
Speaker 2
Yeah, so it was given the right to have its own personality and its own say in international affairs rather than being, you know, a dominion or, or if you recognize the language, before we were a colony, then they made us a dominion, and then slowly over time they say, oh, the Parliamentat- parliamentarians will say, "Oh, we're a independent sovereign nation." Yeah, but at which time do we... That doesn't happen gradually. There's gotta be a time where the clock ticks and it goes click, 12, bang, we're a sovereign independent nation. But no one can tell you when that date is, when it's actually become that, because they've deceived us for all this time.
25:30
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
25:30
Speaker 2
Uh, and all of a sudden just recently now they're saying it. Um, but there's gotta be a time and place when it happened, and it's at 1920. And the reason they're concealing it is because they're all, um, I'm gonna say it, they're all thieves and liars-
25:45
Speaker 1
Thank you.
25:45
Speaker 2
... and they're only looking out for their own, uh, own personal interests.
25:49
Speaker 1
Yep.
25:50
Speaker 2
And, and look, we can even... Look, it's so in your face now and people need to work it out. When you look at the-
25:55
Speaker 1
Well, because they've built, they've built, um, a lot of structures on top of that, right?
26:00
Speaker 2
Absolutely.
26:00
Speaker 1
And so if, if that gets revealed, it's, it's... Let's not say it's just about being thiefs, thieves and liars. If the past gets revealed then everything they've built is on sand.
26:14
Speaker 2
It, it's, it's-
26:15
Speaker 1
They're crazy.
26:15
Speaker 2
... absolutely on, on twiddle sticks, that's for sure.
26:18
Speaker 1
Got it.
26:18
Speaker 2
So, but what I wanted to just say as a quick point of reference, like, when we, uh, drive around the streets and we see, uh, an area of political vote, uh, you know, and you see three faces up there or four faces up. You see one from the national party, one from the lib, the labors, and one from the greens potentially, and you're driving around the suburb and you see them. Like, there's posters all the way down the road. There's posters everywhere.
26:40
Speaker 2
Look, I just wanna say to people, who selected those people-
26:44
Speaker 1
Yes.
26:44
Speaker 2
... for you to elect them?
26:46
Speaker 1
Yes. Good point.
26:48
Speaker 2
Who, and who are they? How did they get there?
26:50
Speaker 1
Good point.
26:52
Speaker 2
You know?
26:52
Speaker 1
Yeah.
26:52
Speaker 2
Um-
26:53
Speaker 1
If people found out-
26:55
Speaker 2
And, and this is what the-
26:55
Speaker 1
... how, how it really is, a big boys club, and how-
26:58
Speaker 2
It is.
26:58
Speaker 1
... we're all just scratching each others backs and, you know, th- they, they should be horrified.
27:04
Speaker 2
That's right. And what the, what they'll say is, "Oh, well, the people voted us in." Yeah, but you picked the people who we could vote from.
27:11
Speaker 1
Correct.
27:11
Speaker 2
It's a cartel.
27:13
Speaker 1
Correct.
27:13
Speaker 2
And if you notice, they're all sons and daughters and children of the previous political people that are there, and they just move them from state to state. That's actually what's happening.
27:22
Speaker 1
Yep.
27:22
Speaker 2
And couldn't say that the people-
27:23
Speaker 1
Connect all their affiliated families and affiliated schools and education and the whole lot.
27:30
Speaker 2
Yeah. So I'll just get Donna to read out Article 10 of the, um... Well, it's actually the League of Nations.
27:37
Speaker 1
Okay.
27:37
Speaker 2
But this League of Nations document, this Article 10 was the same when they signed in the Treaty of Versailles, but it became adopted into the League of Nations and made international law, uh, about three months after the passing of the Parliament here in Australia in 1919. So on the 10th of January, the international law at Article 10 of the League of Nations... D'you wanna read that out, Donna?
28:00
Speaker 3
Yeah. "The members of the League undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity, existing political independence of all members of the League. In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression, the Council shall advise upon the means by which its... this obligation shall be fulfilled."
28:28
Speaker 2
And this is one of the things that the League of Nations sort of failed in its responsibility, because we're, we're... Th- 46 or 45 nations around the world signed this agreement, and as you can see in there, so, "Shall refrain from political interference."
28:43
Speaker 1
And aggress-
28:43
Speaker 2
So political interfer-
28:44
Speaker 1
I mean, this, this is, this is sounding like what we're all being told when we're on hold on a phone at the moment. "Don't have that aggressive behavior and whatnot," right? It's like, so-
28:54
Speaker 2
That's it.
28:55
Speaker 1
... th- this... Back then they were saying if there was any type of aggression. What d- what were they alluding to there?
29:02
Speaker 2
Well, as in, uh, police officers from another nation wearing the crown badge on our territorial lands after we were given our own personality by the blood sacrifice of our soldiers and our 150,000 or 60,000, 1... 60,720 soldiers that were mutilated in the First World War and the 155,000 injured.
29:26
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
29:26
Speaker 2
We... They sacrificed their freedoms and their lives for our freedoms.
29:31
Speaker 1
Yep.
29:31
Speaker 2
And that's why we were giving a standing on the panel of the Treaty of Peace-
29:35
Speaker 1
Yep.
29:35
Speaker 2
... signed at Versailles and th- that was then adopted into the League of Nations. But the League of Nations sort of became a little bit powerless because you got the power of the British territorialists maneuvering over these nations still, but it's against international law. And so when we're talking about political interference, if we said that the UK Parliament signed this document and the Australian Parliament signed this document, how on earth is the, uh, the policeman wearing the crown badge on the land of Australia when it's one of these members?
30:07
Speaker 1
Yep.
30:07
Speaker 3
And there they c- what do they do when they pull you over the side of the road if you don't comply? You get your window smashed. We know people been dragged out of their cars-
30:15
Speaker 1
Yep.
30:15
Speaker 3
... left by the side of the road to walk home in the middle of the night, with, leaving women on the side of the road-
30:20
Speaker 1
Yes.
30:20
Speaker 3
... to somehow find their way home in the middle of the night. They're the acts of aggression that are on our soil, whilst them and their, the police and their bosses have sworn allegiance to the par- the parliamentarians, s- they swear their allegiance off to the UK.
30:34
Speaker 2
Right.
30:34
Speaker 3
"Oh, King, l- live long and prosper, wonderful King." And, and yet, we've, we've got word-for-word the allegiance that they swear in here-
30:42
Speaker 2
Right.
30:42
Speaker 3
... whilst they trample and... By swearing that allegiance, as we're digging into the constitution and other things, it gives them a certain immunity-
30:51
Speaker 1
Right.
30:51
Speaker 3
... so that they can't be sued and can't be hassled and, and we can't know their full names and, and all this kind of, uh, secrecy that they're allowed to hide behind because they've sworn their allegiance to the Crown.
31:03
Speaker 1
So they see that as a power of another jurisdiction that they're in.
31:08
Speaker 2
Absolutely. So what we'll do now, we'll travel down to Article 18. And so, there's always, uh, gotta be the ability for one nation to say another nation can run its laws here. So, when you look at Article 18, and if we can just get Donna to read that out for us. So, Article 18 basically is saying that if you wanna use your laws and your rules, or have an agreement, that must be registered with the League of Nations. And I'll just get Donna to read out Article 18, what it says.
31:38
Speaker 3
"Every treaty or international engagement entered into hereafter by any member of the League shall be forthwith registered with the Secretariat, and shall, as soon as possible, be published by it. No such treaty or international engagement shall be binding until so registered."
31:59
Speaker 1
Oh my gosh.
32:01
Speaker 2
So-
32:01
Speaker 1
(laughs)
32:01
Speaker 2
... so, so what we've got is we've got the con- the... So there's no agreement there, being put there. They're just using their laws here.
32:08
Speaker 1
Yeah.
32:08
Speaker 2
The Constitution is dead in the water after the, our, after our blood sacrifice in World War I. And we were given that freedom by the British people. And this is where the constitutionalists clearly get it wrong. If we open the birdcage and say, "Okay, ouch, hey, uh, oh, the birdies. Should we have a conversation and a vote to see if we're gonna fly out? They're giving us our freedom." And we were given our freedom in 1919 for that sacrifice.
32:33
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
32:33
Speaker 2
But Article 20 of the, um, of the League of Nations, I'll just get Donna to read that out.
32:39
Speaker 3
Sure. "The members of the League, uh, s- severely agree that this covenant is accepted and abrogating all obligations or understandings inter se which are inconsistent with the terms thereof, and solemnly," let me go to the top of the page, uh, "undertake that they will not thereafter enter into any engagements inconsistent with the terms thereof." Um-
33:10
Speaker 2
So, so that's basically saying to you that you, you cannot make any future agreements, uh, that will overrule, unless it's, unless it's registered. And there's been-
33:21
Speaker 1
I'm just, I'm just shaking my head here, because the last two articles that she's read out is saying that if they're going to make any agreements that are any different, they have to register them.
33:31
Speaker 2
That's right.
33:31
Speaker 1
They have to legit with the, the, the League of Nations. And they can't, you know, circumvent that.
33:38
Speaker 2
That's correct.
33:38
Speaker 1
But that's exactly what they've done.
33:40
Speaker 3
Yes, that's right.
33:41
Speaker 2
So, so we'll move on a little bit further now, because what happened in, when World War II came along, uh, the League of Nations, um... Hold on, I'll just go back here. My apologies. So here's all the members that signed the, uh, the tr- the covenant of the League of Nations. You can see Australia, Canada-
33:59
Speaker 3
The Treaty of Peace.
33:59
Speaker 2
Treaty of Peace.
34:00
Speaker 3
Back in 1919.
34:01
Speaker 1
All the conf-
34:02
Speaker 3
See, we're all on there. Don't worry, it's the same for Canada. Same for New Zealand.
34:06
Speaker 1
Yup.
34:07
Speaker 2
Yeah.
34:07
Speaker 3
Yeah.
34:08
Speaker 2
And so they got a Queen of New Zealand, and Canada got a Queen of Canada, which obviously there's no office in those country, in, for the, in those countries. Like in Australia, there's no office for the Queen of Australia.
34:19
Speaker 1
No.
34:20
Speaker 2
There's no crown for the Queen of Australia.
34:22
Speaker 3
Have we s- Have you met her?
34:24
Speaker 1
No.
34:24
Speaker 2
(laughs)
34:26
Speaker 3
No. (laughs)
34:26
Speaker 2
(laughs)
34:26
Speaker 1
No.
34:26
Speaker 3
Because you've got the Queen of England, but the queen can only be the queen over one dominion. Can only be the Queen of England. She can't be the, the same queen can't be the Queen of Australia, the Queen of Canada, the Queen of New Zealand, the queen of-
34:38
Speaker 1
Right.
34:39
Speaker 3
Yeah.
34:39
Speaker 2
Yeah. And so, here we've also got on this-
34:41
Speaker 1
You know, stick to their own territories.
34:42
Speaker 3
Mm.
34:43
Speaker 2
Yeah, absolutely. When you signed that covenant, you had to stay on your own turf.
34:47
Speaker 3
Yes.
34:47
Speaker 2
And you also had to protect the other people's turf who were members of that covenant from any political interference.
34:53
Speaker 1
Sure. Sure.
34:55
Speaker 2
And so we've got, you know, in this document, uh, contemporary scholar confirms independent nationhood. So we've got a lot of documents, but we won't, won't dig into that too, too deep. But, um...
35:09
Speaker 1
Basically, somebody here in Australia could have gone to the League of Nations and said, "Hey, the, the British territory is stepping on our shore, and is doing-"
35:18
Speaker 2
Yeah.
35:18
Speaker 1
"... this, this, this, and this." And they could have lodged, um, you know, some sort of objection, and it could have been dealt with.
35:24
Speaker 2
That's right. That's right. So, um, so then we come along to, uh-
35:29
Speaker 3
But there was some blocks to that. You know, you had to be a sovereign, independent. Pe- people who didn't know they were a sovereign, independent nation state, you had to take it through the Governor-General or something, wasn't it?
35:38
Speaker 2
Yeah, the Governor-General.
35:38
Speaker 3
But don't worry. They had, they had all their little gatekeepers there, so it wasn't quite that easy.
35:43
Speaker 1
Yeah.
35:43
Speaker 2
Yes.
35:43
Speaker 1
Gotcha. Yeah.
35:44
Speaker 2
But it's become, but it has become easier, because of some actions that, uh, Donna and I, and some other great people in the conference-
35:50
Speaker 1
Some people like you two are doing. Okay. Yes, yes.
35:53
Speaker 2
So, then what happened is 1945 came along and the end of the war, and so then they created the United Nations. And they thought to themselves, uh, "We're gonna have to..." The League of Nations became a toothless tiger, "So we're gonna start the United Nations, but we're gonna adopt all its principles into the charter of the United Nations," which it did, and we're gonna go through them in a minute and show you where they are.
36:15
Speaker 1
It just became a good opportunity for them to start re-ramp, reworking everything.
36:19
Speaker 2
Yes.
36:20
Speaker 1
Yeah.
36:20
Speaker 2
But once again, pe- people in court cases that have been held in this country, particularly one in '99 where it was run before, uh, one of the, um, despicable, uh, high court judges who makes one decision one day and then makes another decision the next day, and the opposite the day after.
36:39
Speaker 1
Opposite decision.
36:39
Speaker 2
And we've actually got these court cases in this document here. But however, in 1945, uh, uh, the same as in 1919, Australia and England were founding members of the Covenant of the League of Nations, but we were also founding members of the Charter of the United Nations. We were founding members. And that was run through our parliament here.
37:00
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
37:00
Speaker 2
And-
37:01
Speaker 3
So it turned into an act, it turned into an a- an act, an act for Australia, that, that, uh, that we were, uh, independent, sovereign nation states. So-
37:10
Speaker 2
It was passed into what we would call domestic law. And so-
37:16
Speaker 1
When did they do that?
37:17
Speaker 2
Sorry?
37:17
Speaker 1
And who did that? Who, who ... country it's Uh, I can't, I can't remember his first name. It was something or other. Ford and another, uh, gentleman. They went over there. But the United Nations is a group of people that have been, uh, actually torn in two. You do have a good side, but you've got a bad side there, so they're wrestling with each other- Yeah
37:35
Speaker 2
... as we speak.
37:37
Speaker 1
Right.
37:37
Speaker 2
But it was actually passed into internatio- uh, passed in- passed into domestic law, and I'll just... Just bear with me a second.
37:44
Speaker 3
Legislative, uh, for ratification was effective through the enactment of the Charter of the United Nations, uh, which received royal assent on the...
37:54
Speaker 2
And so you can see it here. See, it's got the Ukrainian kangaroo and emu on there.
37:59
Speaker 3
Where is it? Oh, there you go. It's sort of there. And it's got the, it's got all their stamps and stuff on it. There it is around there. There.
38:08
Speaker 1
Rightio. Rightio.
38:09
Speaker 3
So it's got all their fake seals and everything on it.
38:11
Speaker 2
So if you go into section four of that document, it says, "This Act binds the Crown," which means they have to follow the rules that are in the covenant, th- that are in the-
38:22
Speaker 1
Once again, yeah, there's more rules in place.
38:25
Speaker 2
That's right. And so they were becoming founding members. So, uh, Australia and United Kingdom became founding members, and so when the Act binds the Crown, it means the Crown's got to apply what it is and that means write a new constitution.
38:41
Speaker 3
Okay.
38:41
Speaker 2
Because... And, and if you can see here, we've got also here in the Acts Interpretation Section 2A, which tells you what binds the Crown.
38:50
Speaker 3
Uh-huh.
38:50
Speaker 2
And it binds the Crown in all its aspects. Binds the government, binds its workers, binds all of them. They must comply with this United Nations Charter.
39:00
Speaker 1
Okay. Yep. And that-
39:01
Speaker 2
And-
39:01
Speaker 1
... that means you, Mr. Policeman.
39:04
Speaker 2
Means Mr. Poli-... But the thing is, they... What the policemen are supposed to... Not just the policemen. See, the policemen at the moment can't apply for, uh... Abide by it, because he's wearing the Crown badge. This is the problem.
39:18
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
39:18
Speaker 2
So what we're gonna do is we're gonna have a look here now, and we have written in this document here to attorney generals and asked them, "What does Act bind the Crown?"
39:29
Speaker 1
Okay.
39:29
Speaker 2
And I'll let Don arena out. What does the Act bind the Crown? We-... Can you just go back to the paragraph that I wrote to them and read it out?
39:38
Speaker 3
Yep. Uh, when, uh... I'll just go back to the foreign minister.
39:42
Speaker 2
I wrote to... I wrote... We wrote to, uh, the six or seven attorney generals and only two responded to us, but they actually gave us the answer that when the Act binds the Crown it means... I'll just get Donna to, to read it out.
39:54
Speaker 1
So this is Peter Holt-
39:56
Speaker 3
So they want-
39:56
Speaker 1
... that she ... Sh- yes, that he told-
39:56
Speaker 3
Yeah, this is... So we're writing to the attorney general, all the attorney generals we wrote to, so, "Please can you confirm below, the below status of the specific expressed words in certain Acts, namely the following, 'Act binds the Crown in the right of the commonwealth of each state, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory.'" "Am I correct in assuming when an Act of Parliament, legislation, expressed the words, 'Binds the Crown,' it means that all governments, including all its departments, ministers, agents, and statutory bodies, must comply with the law just like ordinary citizens and companies?" Now, what, what that's saying is that, of course, they, they give themselves the same immunity that the Crown has. Uh, you have to take it to one of their courts to try and, you know...
40:44
Speaker 3
(laughs) One of their courts that they're all in, or with their, with their mates, but-
40:47
Speaker 1
Yep.
40:47
Speaker 3
... to try and get any justice.
40:49
Speaker 1
Yep.
40:49
Speaker 2
So, w- why I was asking that question, because this Act binds the Crowns in the Uni- in the charter of the United Nations passed into domestic law in this country.
40:59
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
40:59
Speaker 2
So, we wrote this to the, uh, to a couple, or to six or seven of the attorney generals.
41:05
Speaker 1
Yep.
41:05
Speaker 2
And two of them responded and basically said... Not basically. Have said, "Yes, you are correct," especially the Tasmanian one.
41:12
Speaker 1
Okay.
41:13
Speaker 2
Uh, and so we have these letters here, uh, saying that, that I am correct. Let's, let's travel a little bit further down. We're now going to have a look at Article 2, paragraph one and paragraph four of that United Nations Charter, and I'll just get Donna to read it out.
41:28
Speaker 3
I'll just read it quickly. I know I haven't got much time left. Um, so, "Article 1, the purpose of the United Nations are to maintain..." Do you want Article 1 or Article 2?
41:36
Speaker 2
No, Article 2, paragraph one and four.
41:39
Speaker 3
Oh, sorry. Uh, "The organization of its members," this is Article 2, "in pursuant of the purpose stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following principles." So number one is, "The organization is based on the principles of the sovereign equality of all its members. Peace and security and justice are not endangered." Huh?
42:03
Speaker 2
So-
42:04
Speaker 3
Yeah. (laughs)
42:04
Speaker 2
... so have we got political independence here when our, when our-
42:09
Speaker 1
Oh, my God. Political sovereignty. I mean, they're trying to bastardize the word sovereignty out there in the world at the moment.
42:16
Speaker 2
That's right. So with the Constitution Act of 1900 on our turf, our federal parliament swearing an allegiance to the Constitution or to the Queen of, uh, England or... You know, and the, in, in the sovereignty of the United Kingdom-
42:33
Speaker 1
Yep.
42:33
Speaker 2
... that means they're trespassing here. They're trespassers.
42:36
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
42:37
Speaker 2
And they... And under international law, they're trespassing. But the people of the nation don't know it, because we're all... They got us on the hamster wheel, and we haven't had a chance to actually have a look at this and pull it all apart, but we have. And this is where-
42:50
Speaker 1
And what you're saying tonight, like everything, every step you've been through, is that there's just evidence that they've broken the rules. They've broken the rules, over and over again.
42:58
Speaker 2
Absolutely. They're terrorists. Unfortunately, we have a terrorist regime running this nation, and it's so easy to prove. But the problem we've got is we've got people like David McBride, who was a courageous whistleblower, blowing the whistle on, um-... Brenton Robert Smith and a number of other ones, that they were killing farmers over there, and he had the video footage of it. But because he stole their secrets and gave it to the media, now you're going to jail for five years-
43:24
Speaker 3
Yeah.
43:24
Speaker 2
... for stealing the secrets, for being a whistleblower.
43:27
Speaker 3
Yeah.
43:27
Speaker 2
So, this is a, a serious problem in this nation.
43:31
Speaker 3
Yeah.
43:31
Speaker 2
So, anyway, so we'll just... I'll just get Donna to read out paragraph four of Article 2.
43:36
Speaker 3
(laughs) Yep.
43:37
Speaker 2
Can you read that out?
43:38
Speaker 3
"All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent..." Yeah, hang in there. "Inconsistent with the purpose of the United Nations."
43:57
Speaker 2
So, the United Nations is based on sovereign independence.
44:00
Speaker 3
(clears throat) It's a double whammy. Oh, it goes on and on. Hey, guess what? I've figured out who the sovereign citizen is. So who's sovereign? Who says they're sovereign? The Queen Mm
44:11
Speaker 2
The Queen's the sovereign, isn't she? Or the King
44:13
Speaker 3
Or the King. The King or the Queen, the monarch. They're the sovereign. But who's a British citizen as well? The King or the Queen. So they're the ultimate sovereign citizens- Sovereign citizen
44:22
Speaker 2
(laughs)
44:22
Speaker 3
... the King and the Queen. 'Cause they're, they're pretending to be sovereign over us-
44:26
Speaker 2
Yeah.
44:26
Speaker 3
... but they're also coming under like a British citizen. So, don't think you're a sovereign citizen. Be pleased you're not. Only the Queen's a sovereign citizen.
44:35
Speaker 2
And the reason that they're citi-
44:37
Speaker 3
We'll, we'll leave her with that title, yes. We'll leave her with that title
44:39
Speaker 2
Yeah. And, and the reason they're citizens is because they're British subjects, and under the Act of Settlement... And we won't have time to go into that today, but under the Act of Settlement, they are actually British citizens.
44:51
Speaker 3
Okay. Mm Yeah
44:52
Speaker 2
'Cause the Queen's subordinate to the United Kingdom Parliament. She's not in charge of it, she's subordinate. She can't leave the country-
45:00
Speaker 3
Yep.
45:00
Speaker 2
... she has to ask... She's... You know. A- and so, you know, we find out she's not even supposed to be coming over signing anything. That's just another whammy.
45:07
Speaker 3
Yes.
45:07
Speaker 2
Yes.
45:08
Speaker 3
Yes, yes.
45:08
Speaker 2
So, if you can imagine, so Article 10 became Article... Article 10 in the Covenant of the League of Nations became Article 2 in the Charter of the United Nations. And Article 18 became Article 103 or 102 in the Charter of the United Nations, which says basically the same thing. If you, if you gonna use your laws on another nation, then you must register it. And-
45:33
Speaker 3
Absolutely.
45:34
Speaker 2
And-
45:35
Speaker 3
Absolutely.
45:36
Speaker 2
And-
45:36
Speaker 3
Yeah, absolutely.
45:36
Speaker 2
... if you've got any agreement before, you have to do all, all your efforts to get rid of it, because the Charter of the United Nations reigns supreme. Which means-
45:45
Speaker 3
And it also tells you how you're supposed to behave as well.
45:49
Speaker 2
Yeah.
45:49
Speaker 3
Correct.
45:49
Speaker 2
It does. Yeah, that's right. Correct. And so we've also got these two United Nations resolutions, 1965 and 1970, which clearly, uh, indicates that, uh... And I'll just get Donna to read it out here
46:03
Speaker 3
Well, we haven't got much time left.
46:04
Speaker 2
Yeah. So it's basically-
46:05
Speaker 3
We've got 11 minutes.
46:05
Speaker 2
... to get rid of colonial-
46:07
Speaker 3
We're doing all right.
46:07
Speaker 2
We've gotta get... I- it- th- these resolutions saying that we have to get rid of colonial powers.
46:13
Speaker 3
Mm. Yeah, it's instructing us to get, to get rid of the colonial (laughs) powers, which we've already done, but clearly, they haven't abided by.
46:21
Speaker 2
They keep wiggling their way in here.
46:23
Speaker 3
Yes.
46:24
Speaker 2
So, then the... Again, the Australian government keeps perverting the course of justice.
46:28
Speaker 3
Well, it's also-
46:29
Speaker 2
And so-
46:29
Speaker 3
... putting up a false flag that gets everybody distracted and, and confused-
46:33
Speaker 2
Mm.
46:33
Speaker 3
... about what's going on.
46:35
Speaker 2
And so, I bet you no one can, uh, point a finger at how much Australia donates to the United Nations every year, and I'll tell you, it's $5 billion. And here's the chart here. That's how much we donate to the United Nations programs, $5 billion. So, for them to donate, and that's from our taxpayers' money, and not comply-
46:57
Speaker 3
Yeah.
46:57
Speaker 2
... they're war crimes.
46:58
Speaker 3
Yeah.
46:59
Speaker 2
They're committing war crimes against, against the people.
47:01
Speaker 3
Wh- what are we donating that money for?
47:04
Speaker 2
(laughs)
47:04
Speaker 3
Exactly.
47:04
Speaker 2
Well, they're for rebuilding projects. I don't necessarily have, uh, too much of an issue with it, but we don't have any accountability of where it's going and what it's doing. But that... We really just put that in there for people like Justice Hayne that said, "It hasn't been passed into domestic law," and that was in a High Court case in 1999, again, some very courageous people who wrote the book called The Concealed Colony. Uh, and basically, they, the, the High Court justices are just running over these facts. But we're here to express these facts and tell everybody that we have a government that doesn't comply with international law.
47:43
Speaker 3
That's right.
47:43
Speaker 2
And it does what it wants. And-
47:45
Speaker 3
And doesn't comply with human rights-
47:47
Speaker 2
Yes.
47:47
Speaker 3
... or any kind of other bill of rights, or anything like that.
47:50
Speaker 2
Yep.
47:50
Speaker 3
And while the constitutionalists keep pushing the constitution, and wanna, want the people back under as British subjects, that seems to not be the correct direction either.
47:59
Speaker 2
Yeah.
47:59
Speaker 3
It's really a matter of noting that we are a sovereign, independent nation state, and, uh, doing a new constitution, and holding the people who have been lying to us to account.
48:10
Speaker 2
Mm-hmm.
48:11
Speaker 3
Mm-hmm.
48:11
Speaker 2
And-
48:11
Speaker 3
So this criminal cartel has been in the background the whole time, and every time the rest of the world is trying to get them to conform and comply, and, you know, and, and stick to the rules, they've just been ducking and weaving along the way. Very much
48:25
Speaker 2
Absolutely.
48:25
Speaker 3
Very much.
48:26
Speaker 2
But their time is near, that's for sure.
48:28
Speaker 3
Well, because we've got people like you that are putting it all together in a sequence, and... Yeah.
48:33
Speaker 2
Mm.
48:33
Speaker 3
And, and with the evidence. And you're not the only ones, right? There-
48:37
Speaker 2
No, that's right.
48:38
Speaker 3
There-
48:38
Speaker 2
And, and people, if they can do the, again, coming back to the victim impact statement-
48:43
Speaker 3
Yep.
48:43
Speaker 2
... it would be greatly appreciated-
48:44
Speaker 3
Yes.
48:45
Speaker 2
... 'cause that's how... I know it seems like we're talking about 1920 and that, but it's gone on for 106 years.
48:51
Speaker 3
Yes.
48:51
Speaker 2
And that's why there's no law on this land. That's why we- we're, we've been, um, uh, invaded by a, a, a foreign, a foreign- Ter- territorialists ... nation. Yeah, we've been, uh, and they're swearing their allegiance to that. So that's why they don't have the best interests of Australia and the Australian people at heart
49:09
Speaker 3
Mm.
49:09
Speaker 2
... because they're basically, uh, uh, UK mob.
49:13
Speaker 3
Yeah.
49:13
Speaker 1
... and making up their own rules. So, we're looking at court systems-
49:16
Speaker 2
Making up their own rules, without accountability. Yeah.
49:18
Speaker 1
We're looking at court systems, and court systems here were looking for justice, and nobody's getting it.
49:23
Speaker 2
You can't get it, it's not here.
49:24
Speaker 1
Nobody's getting it, because as you said-
49:26
Speaker 2
This is-
49:26
Speaker 1
... earlier, they're banking systems now. I even went to court recently with someone, it was a family court issue. And the judge clearly said this out loud, "The father hasn't got much, he's going broke. His business isn't making a whole lot of money. The wife, she got some money, but she's spent it all, so she hasn't got much left." And you could see her weighing it up and she's like, you know, i- in the background you could hear her clicking away going, "There's no money to keep a court case going for too long, so let's do a trial and let's get it sorted, 'cause that way we're gonna use up the rest of the money that they got and that'll be the end of the story."
49:58
Speaker 2
That's right.
49:59
Speaker 3
So good point. Yeah.
49:59
Speaker 1
It was nothing about the family-
50:01
Speaker 2
Now all they're left with-
50:01
Speaker 1
... the, the property-
50:02
Speaker 3
Nah.
50:02
Speaker 1
... the children. It was about who had what funds left and how long can this thing run?
50:07
Speaker 2
That's right.
50:07
Speaker 3
Yeah, 'cause they're all bankrupt. They're all go- on, they're all not... Well, they're all, uh, you know, the government basically is bankrupt as far as this goes.
50:16
Speaker 1
Well, she was just looking at it as a financial transaction.
50:18
Speaker 3
Yeah. It is.
50:18
Speaker 1
That's all she was doing.
50:20
Speaker 2
Mm.
50:20
Speaker 3
Mm.
50:20
Speaker 1
And I saw it quite clearly and I was horrified.
50:24
Speaker 3
Yeah, that's right.
50:25
Speaker 2
You won't get any justice in these courts, and that's why we've been forced to go international.
50:29
Speaker 1
And that's why they-
50:29
Speaker 3
Yeah, we're not taking... Oh, yeah, we're not taking this to these courts. (laughs)
50:32
Speaker 1
Yeah.
50:33
Speaker 3
These courts will be im- implied in it.
50:35
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
50:36
Speaker 3
It's about these courts.
50:37
Speaker 1
Yeah.
50:37
Speaker 3
We can't take it to these courts. That's why we have to go to ICC, ICJ, whatever that looks like overseas. We've bolstered by other people, international lawyers' reports about our documents. So we're just putting it through the proofreading now and tidying it up and we will be, um, yeah, getting the, the other people a- around, international lawyers and other people overseas to give their opinion on it.
51:01
Speaker 3
And we'll be putting all of that, as well as the victim impact statements-
51:04
Speaker 1
Yep.
51:04
Speaker 3
... into the, uh, into the court for people. So if you, if you feel you haven't been heard in this nation, please send some through.
51:10
Speaker 1
Please.
51:11
Speaker 3
Victim impact statements.
51:11
Speaker 1
Absolutely.
51:12
Speaker 3
Yeah. 'Cause a lot of us-
51:13
Speaker 1
Yeah.
51:13
Speaker 3
... have gone through courts and been shafted.
51:15
Speaker 1
Yep. And it's gonna become evidence for you guys as well.
51:18
Speaker 3
That's right.
51:18
Speaker 1
So that's how vitally important it is. Uh-
51:21
Speaker 3
Very much so.
51:21
Speaker 1
... I can't say it loud enough or enough really for people to get on your website and do that. And the link will be here with the show notes as well. So-
51:29
Speaker 2
Where's that gone?
51:29
Speaker 1
... tell me, how do you find the good guys when y- you said ICC, what is that?
51:35
Speaker 3
International Criminal Court. And International Court of Justice is the ICJ.
51:39
Speaker 1
Right. How do you f- how do you find the good guys?
51:42
Speaker 3
With great difficulty. (laughs) And they're with great secrecy. (laughs)
51:46
Speaker 1
Right.
51:47
Speaker 3
Yeah. (laughs)
51:48
Speaker 1
Yes, yes.
51:48
Speaker 3
Yeah. Yeah. There's a few. 'Cause they can see how filthy it is as well. Often, they're ex participants in it in some way, so, you know-
51:55
Speaker 1
Yeah.
51:55
Speaker 3
... that's gone.
51:55
Speaker 1
Yes.
51:55
Speaker 3
Yeah, we're done.
51:57
Speaker 1
Okay. So everyone's just quietly stepping into the corridors to the side and you're all kind of meeting and yeah, quietly getting some things ready. Yes?
52:07
Speaker 3
Yeah.
52:08
Speaker 2
That's correct, yes.
52:08
Speaker 3
Because w- we want some big movement from proving this. We're not just gonna come back with a bit of fanfare.
52:14
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
52:14
Speaker 3
We wanna come back with, you know, basically military style arrests-
52:19
Speaker 1
Right.
52:19
Speaker 3
... for the, for the, for the perpetrators of this.
52:22
Speaker 1
Yeah. Gosh, this is-
52:24
Speaker 3
Yeah.
52:24
Speaker 1
... big stuff.
52:25
Speaker 3
Yeah, it is.
52:25
Speaker 1
This is really like historical time stuff that's going on right now.
52:32
Speaker 3
Yeah.
52:32
Speaker 1
I hope people really start to understand how incredibly vital it is-
52:37
Speaker 3
Mm.
52:38
Speaker 1
... that we start seeing the truth of what's really going on. And you know, get your heads out of the sand, guys.
52:46
Speaker 3
Yeah.
52:46
Speaker 2
And not, and not only that, this is, this is the most prosperous nation in the world.
52:50
Speaker 1
It is.
52:50
Speaker 2
And yet-
52:51
Speaker 3
Uh-huh.
52:52
Speaker 2
... we've got pe- our own people living on the street. It's, you-
52:55
Speaker 3
Uh-huh.
52:55
Speaker 2
... know, if we were in one of the, a couple of these other nations around the world, and I can't bring them to mind at the moment, but they, there's no tax there and they all get payments every year.
53:05
Speaker 1
UAE and Qatar, there's no tax.
53:07
Speaker 3
Denmark.
53:07
Speaker 1
There's countries that are running on their own-
53:09
Speaker 2
And was Denmark as well, I think. Yeah.
53:10
Speaker 1
Yeah.
53:11
Speaker 3
Yeah.
53:11
Speaker 1
Yeah. And-
53:12
Speaker 2
Yeah.
53:12
Speaker 1
... I mean, you've, may have heard of the WA secession. There's been a manifesto written by four, two, um, professors of economics here in Australia, a lawyer, and also Professor Ian Brighthope, who I've had on the show. I'm tracking down, um, a couple of them at the moment. I wanna talk to them about secession, 'cause they've realized the same thing that you guys have, that the, the British territory has no say in what we do here.
53:38
Speaker 1
And they want to pull WA out of, um, and create it as its own country-
53:44
Speaker 3
Yeah. Could be.
53:44
Speaker 1
... separate from the rest of Australia. And they're gonna start-
53:47
Speaker 2
They, they could stand on this work eventually.
53:49
Speaker 1
Yeah.
53:49
Speaker 3
Yes.
53:50
Speaker 2
When this work gets through, they could stand on this too.
53:51
Speaker 1
And they've already put a manifesto together and they've got some cages rattling, because two professors of economics figured out the economics of this entire country and how it could run if 65% of the bureaucracy was gone.
54:05
Speaker 3
Oh, absolutely. That's a hallelujah moment when that happens.
54:08
Speaker 1
Yes. Yes.
54:09
Speaker 3
Yeah.
54:10
Speaker 1
They realize just how much... For WA, they've got about $10 billion a year in their resources going directly-
54:17
Speaker 3
Mm-hmm.
54:17
Speaker 1
... to the East Coast of Australia and to Canberra in particular.
54:21
Speaker 2
Wow.
54:21
Speaker 1
And they're sick of it.
54:24
Speaker 3
Let alone the complete rape and pillage of the land through the mining that we seem-
54:28
Speaker 1
Their resource-
54:29
Speaker 3
... not scaring of.
54:29
Speaker 1
... their resources.
54:30
Speaker 3
You know, uh, that, so it's-
54:31
Speaker 1
Absolutely. So, so I love what you're doing because you're attacking it from one angle. I'm, I'm, I'm just seeing others, you know, it's, it's not just now about people wanting to be sovereign and separate and have the chooks out the back and the veggie garden.
54:46
Speaker 3
Yeah.
54:47
Speaker 1
That this is now becoming a very intellectual, very educated, very professional play-
54:53
Speaker 3
Mm, mm.
54:53
Speaker 1
... at serious change in this country.
54:57
Speaker 3
Mm.
54:57
Speaker 1
In the world.
54:58
Speaker 2
Absolutely. And we won't stop until we get it.
55:00
Speaker 1
Yeah.
55:00
Speaker 3
And that's why they wanna brand people who, who start to know the truth and dig in with these silly brand names that we reject, uh, adamantly. We're not sovereign citizens at all.
55:10
Speaker 1
Yeah.
55:10
Speaker 3
That's the Queen. (laughs) She's a sovereign citizen.
55:13
Speaker 2
Yeah.
55:13
Speaker 3
Not me.
55:14
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
55:14
Speaker 3
Not us at all. So we reject those titles and, uh, yeah, we- we press on and, and say that, uh-Please, please continue to, um, see this happening, have it in a vision w- with us, share the vision. And, uh, and we, um, we are safe with each other as best we can be, and we just, uh, pray that, uh, no ill will comes towards us.
55:38
Speaker 1
Well, my focus is always on the new world.
55:41
Speaker 3
Mm.
55:41
Speaker 1
The new world that we're creating. And I want to reassure people on top of what you just said, um, you better start figuring out how incredibly creative we are and what we're capable of-
55:53
Speaker 3
Yeah.
55:53
Speaker 1
... because if you focus entirely on that new world, full of kind, loving human beings, then nothing else can touch you. And I can't stress that strongly enough. I've had enough experiences in my own life, and you may have too. It's like, it just, that, that old corruption and, and whatever, it can't come near you. And if we just-
56:19
Speaker 3
It's the light. And the light keeps shining and then showing us where it is.
56:22
Speaker 1
That's it. That's it.
56:22
Speaker 3
Okay? There it is, there it is, there it is. And this is how you deal with it now.
56:26
Speaker 1
Yeah.
56:26
Speaker 3
Or else we were a bit kind of confused before, you know?
56:29
Speaker 1
That's a great way of explaining it. Thank you very much. (laughs) Yeah, the light is just exposing it-
56:36
Speaker 3
Yeah.
56:36
Speaker 1
... and also giving us the ideas and the, and the, the, the imagination as well, is what to do with it.
56:42
Speaker 3
And if people want to read a pre- prelude to this document, they can get The Concealed Colony, 'cause we really are standing on the shoulders of those incredible men and women who did that.
56:51
Speaker 1
The concealed colonists.
56:52
Speaker 3
The Concealed Colonies, a fantastic document.
56:54
Speaker 1
Mm-hmm.
56:54
Speaker 3
It's liter- literally like a prelude reading to what we're about to launch, and we've got a lot of, uh, facts from there as well. So we're very appreciative to those people and we definitely acknowledge them in every way.
57:05
Speaker 1
Fantastic.
57:07
Speaker 3
Mm.
57:07
Speaker 1
All right. Well, we've got 40 seconds to go, so boy, did we fly through all of that. So-
57:13
Speaker 3
(laughs) It was great work. (laughs)
57:14
Speaker 1
It was. It was.
57:16
Speaker 3
Yeah.
57:16
Speaker 1
When we got started, we weren't sure-
57:17
Speaker 3
There's so much more.
57:17
Speaker 1
... what we were gonna get through, but thank you, thank you. Like, you've just kept this thing moving the whole way through. And you know, I love also that the, the two brothers that run the BBS Radio platform have AI involved in what they're doing as well. So they actually get the show, and once it's gone live, um, it, AI breaks it down, does a beautiful summary.
57:39
Speaker 3
Oh, great.
57:39
Speaker 1
So everything we've been talking about will just be summarized under little topics and stuff, which will make it-
57:46
Speaker 3
Okay.
57:46
Speaker 1
... a bit more succinct for some people, because yeah, it's pretty heavy stuff. But, you know, people need to know this stuff.
57:54
Speaker 3
They do. They do. Unless they want to be in a digital prison.
57:57
Speaker 1
Correct.
57:58
Speaker 3
Exactly. (laughs)
57:58
Speaker 1
That's great. That's a great way to finish off.
58:01
Speaker 3
I was just saying.
58:02
Speaker 1
That's a great way to finish off, Donna. Thank you very much.
58:05
Speaker 3
(laughs)
58:05
Speaker 1
Thank you, both of you. I love what you're doing. And boy, you think you're standing on the shoulders of giants? You've got a queue waiting up behind you, I think. (laughs)
58:15
Speaker 3
Thank you so much. Thank you so much.
58:17
Speaker 4
Thank you.
58:17
Speaker 3
It's so beautiful, Helen. And, and bless you and your audience. Thank you so much.
58:20
Speaker 1
Thank you. Thank you, both. Thank you so much. Okay.
58:23
Speaker 4
Our pleasure.
58:24
Speaker 1
Thank you, everybody.
58:25
Speaker 3
Bye for now. We'll catch you soon.
58:26
Speaker 1
Mm.
58:27
Speaker 3
Bye.
