Produced and Delivered Web-TV Programming
Signs of Life with Bob Ginsberg
Guest, Liz Entin, a skeptic and author, Liz brings a unique perspective to the mediumship conversation
Tonight on Signs of Life Radio, Host Bob Ginsberg will be interviewing Liz Entin. Liz began examining if there was evidence of an afterlife and anything paranormal in 2015 following the passing of her father. While she still considers herself skeptical and an atheist, (although she’s a cultural Jew), the evidence really blew her away. She is the author and podcast host of WTF Just Happened?!
Bringing You Evidence of An Afterlife Since 2004
Forever Family Foundation is a global 100%volunteer non-profit, non-sectarian organization that supports the premise that life does not end with physical death, furthers the understanding of Afterlife Science and survival of consciousness, and offers support to the bereaved.
Among the active members of the organization and the executive board are scientists, researchers, medical doctors, philosophers and educators who have devoted substantial parts of their careers to the investigation of the survival hypothesis - an existence beyond this physical world.
Guest, Liz Entin, a skeptic and author, Liz brings a unique perspective to the mediumship conversation
Tonight on Signs of Life Radio, Host Bob Ginsberg will be interviewing Liz Entin. Liz began examining if there was evidence of an afterlife and anything paranormal in 2015 following the passing of her father. While she still considers herself skeptical and an atheist, (although she’s a cultural Jew), the evidence really blew her away. She is the author and podcast host of WTF Just Happened?!
Bringing You Evidence of An Afterlife Since 2004
Forever Family Foundation is a global 100%volunteer non-profit, non-sectarian organization that supports the premise that life does not end with physical death, furthers the understanding of Afterlife Science and survival of consciousness, and offers support to the bereaved.
Among the active members of the organization and the executive board are scientists, researchers, medical doctors, philosophers and educators who have devoted substantial parts of their careers to the investigation of the survival hypothesis - an existence beyond this physical world.
Sons Of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean
Sheriff Richard Mack Joins Bradlee Dean LIVE
Sheriff Richard Mack on Constitutional Duty, Gun Rights, and the Fight Against Federal Overreach
Radio Transcript Analysis
The Sheriff's Shield: Sovereignty & The 2nd Amendment
Sheriff Richard Mack on the "Killing Zone" theory and the Constitutional duty to interpose.
Host: Bradlee Dean
Guest: Sheriff Richard Mack
Date: Jan 30, 2026
#10thAmendment #MackVsUS#GunFreeZones#CSPOA
Critical Statistic
94%
Of mass public shootings in the U.S. occur in designated "Gun-Free Zones" (Source: Crime Prevention Research Center).
Historical Context: Mack v. U.S. (1997)
Sheriff Mack successfully sued the Clinton administration over the Brady Bill. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot commandeer state/county officers to enforce federal regulatory programs.
Core Arguments & Insights
The "Killing Zone" ParadoxDean argues that disarming citizens in specific zones creates soft targets for criminals, while politicians remain protected by armed security details.
The Sheriff's Ultimate AuthorityMack asserts that Sheriffs answer only to their local constituents, not the Federal AG or Governor. They have the power to refuse enforcement of unconstitutional laws.
Bureaucracy vs. DutyCriticism of modern sheriffs acting as "bureaucrats" rather than defenders of the Constitution due to fear of media backlash or losing funding.
"The Constitution then contemplates that a State's government will represent and remain accountable to its own citizens."
— Justice Antonin Scalia (Cited from Mack v. United States Opinion)
Action Item: Join the CSPOA Posse
Source: Sons of Liberty Radio | Duration: ~1hr 12m
Introduction
Host Bradlee Dean welcomes Sheriff Richard Mack (CSPOA) to discuss the critical role of the county sheriff in resisting federal overreach and the dangers of "gun-free zones." Mack recounts his historic 1994 Supreme Court victory against the Clinton administration's Brady Bill and argues that modern sheriffs must stop acting like bureaucrats and start defending the Constitution against arbitrary government power.
Detailed Summary
The Fallacy of Gun-Free Zones and Arbitrary Power
The discussion opens with a critique of "arbitrary government," defined as power depending on will or discretion rather than fixed rules. A central argument is presented regarding the hypocrisy of disarmament: while government officials, banks, and sports events are protected by guns, citizens are forced into "gun-free zones," which are described as "killing zones." It is noted that 94% of mass public shootings in the United States since 1950 have occurred in these designated gun-free areas.
The "Protection Paradox" Argument
Government & Assets
Protected by Guns
Congress, Courts, Banks, Celebrities
The People
"Gun-Free Zones"
94% of Mass Shootings occur here
The Historic 1994 Supreme Court Victory
Sheriff Mack details his pivotal legal battle against the Clinton administration in 1994. After refusing to enforce the Brady Bill—which mandated local sheriffs perform background checks for the federal government without funding—Mack sued the administration. Despite the threat of prison and fines, Mack stood his ground, though he notes that out of 3,086 sheriffs in the US, only seven eventually joined the lawsuit. The case (Mack v. United States) resulted in a landmark Supreme Court victory for the 10th Amendment and state sovereignty, with Justice Scalia writing the majority opinion and Justice Thomas providing a strong concurrence.
The Current War on Sheriffs
The conversation shifts to modern challenges, asserting that the office of the sheriff is currently under attack by state governments and "woke agendas." Specific examples are cited, such as the Sheriff of King County, Washington, being converted from an elected official to an appointed bureaucrat, and other sheriffs facing lawsuits for attempting to assist with deportation or resisting state mandates. Mack emphasizes that a sheriff answers only to the people of their county, not to the governor, the legislature, or the federal government.
The Constitutional Sheriff's Hierarchy
According to Sheriff Mack's CSPOA Doctrine
1. The Constitution (Supreme Law)
2. The People of the County (The Boss)
3. Federal/State Mandates (Only if Constitutional)
A Call for Courage and Action
Both Dean and Mack criticize the apathy of the American public and the timidity of many current law enforcement officials. Mack recounts instances where sheriffs refused to stand with him publicly due to fear of media attacks. They argue that citizens must stop merely complaining and actively engage in the preservation of liberty. This includes joining the CSPOA "Posse" to support local sheriffs and ensuring that elected officials have actually read and understood the Constitution they swear to uphold.
Key Data
94%: The percentage of mass public shootings in the US since 1950 that have occurred in gun-free zones.
7 of 3,086: The number of sheriffs who joined the lawsuit against the federal government regarding the Brady Bill in 1994.
20 Years: Richard Mack's total law enforcement experience (12 years as a cop/detective, 8 years as Sheriff).
To-Do / Next Steps
Citizens are urged to join the CSPOA Posse to receive training on how to effectively work with their local sheriffs.
Listeners can purchase a fundraising bundle (Challenge Coin, Silver Peace Dollar, and the Supreme Court case booklet) for a $100 donation at cspoa.org.
Voters must aggressively question candidates about their knowledge of the Constitution's foundational texts (Creation, We the People, Article IV Section 4) before casting a vote.
Law enforcement officers currently on probation are advised to continue writing tickets to protect their jobs, but to let their conscience guide them once off probation.
Conclusion
The broadcast concludes that the battle for liberty is not against external enemies but stems from internal apathy and a lack of constitutional knowledge. Sheriff Mack and Bradlee Dean emphasize that freedom requires eternal vigilance and that citizens must hold their "servants" in government accountable to the supreme law of the land.
Sheriff Richard Mack Joins Bradlee Dean LIVE
Sheriff Richard Mack on Constitutional Duty, Gun Rights, and the Fight Against Federal Overreach
Radio Transcript Analysis
The Sheriff's Shield: Sovereignty & The 2nd Amendment
Sheriff Richard Mack on the "Killing Zone" theory and the Constitutional duty to interpose.
Host: Bradlee Dean
Guest: Sheriff Richard Mack
Date: Jan 30, 2026
#10thAmendment #MackVsUS#GunFreeZones#CSPOA
Critical Statistic
94%
Of mass public shootings in the U.S. occur in designated "Gun-Free Zones" (Source: Crime Prevention Research Center).
Historical Context: Mack v. U.S. (1997)
Sheriff Mack successfully sued the Clinton administration over the Brady Bill. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot commandeer state/county officers to enforce federal regulatory programs.
Core Arguments & Insights
The "Killing Zone" ParadoxDean argues that disarming citizens in specific zones creates soft targets for criminals, while politicians remain protected by armed security details.
The Sheriff's Ultimate AuthorityMack asserts that Sheriffs answer only to their local constituents, not the Federal AG or Governor. They have the power to refuse enforcement of unconstitutional laws.
Bureaucracy vs. DutyCriticism of modern sheriffs acting as "bureaucrats" rather than defenders of the Constitution due to fear of media backlash or losing funding.
"The Constitution then contemplates that a State's government will represent and remain accountable to its own citizens."
— Justice Antonin Scalia (Cited from Mack v. United States Opinion)
Action Item: Join the CSPOA Posse
Source: Sons of Liberty Radio | Duration: ~1hr 12m
Introduction
Host Bradlee Dean welcomes Sheriff Richard Mack (CSPOA) to discuss the critical role of the county sheriff in resisting federal overreach and the dangers of "gun-free zones." Mack recounts his historic 1994 Supreme Court victory against the Clinton administration's Brady Bill and argues that modern sheriffs must stop acting like bureaucrats and start defending the Constitution against arbitrary government power.
Detailed Summary
The Fallacy of Gun-Free Zones and Arbitrary Power
The discussion opens with a critique of "arbitrary government," defined as power depending on will or discretion rather than fixed rules. A central argument is presented regarding the hypocrisy of disarmament: while government officials, banks, and sports events are protected by guns, citizens are forced into "gun-free zones," which are described as "killing zones." It is noted that 94% of mass public shootings in the United States since 1950 have occurred in these designated gun-free areas.
The "Protection Paradox" Argument
Government & Assets
Protected by Guns
Congress, Courts, Banks, Celebrities
The People
"Gun-Free Zones"
94% of Mass Shootings occur here
The Historic 1994 Supreme Court Victory
Sheriff Mack details his pivotal legal battle against the Clinton administration in 1994. After refusing to enforce the Brady Bill—which mandated local sheriffs perform background checks for the federal government without funding—Mack sued the administration. Despite the threat of prison and fines, Mack stood his ground, though he notes that out of 3,086 sheriffs in the US, only seven eventually joined the lawsuit. The case (Mack v. United States) resulted in a landmark Supreme Court victory for the 10th Amendment and state sovereignty, with Justice Scalia writing the majority opinion and Justice Thomas providing a strong concurrence.
The Current War on Sheriffs
The conversation shifts to modern challenges, asserting that the office of the sheriff is currently under attack by state governments and "woke agendas." Specific examples are cited, such as the Sheriff of King County, Washington, being converted from an elected official to an appointed bureaucrat, and other sheriffs facing lawsuits for attempting to assist with deportation or resisting state mandates. Mack emphasizes that a sheriff answers only to the people of their county, not to the governor, the legislature, or the federal government.
The Constitutional Sheriff's Hierarchy
According to Sheriff Mack's CSPOA Doctrine
1. The Constitution (Supreme Law)
2. The People of the County (The Boss)
3. Federal/State Mandates (Only if Constitutional)
A Call for Courage and Action
Both Dean and Mack criticize the apathy of the American public and the timidity of many current law enforcement officials. Mack recounts instances where sheriffs refused to stand with him publicly due to fear of media attacks. They argue that citizens must stop merely complaining and actively engage in the preservation of liberty. This includes joining the CSPOA "Posse" to support local sheriffs and ensuring that elected officials have actually read and understood the Constitution they swear to uphold.
Key Data
94%: The percentage of mass public shootings in the US since 1950 that have occurred in gun-free zones.
7 of 3,086: The number of sheriffs who joined the lawsuit against the federal government regarding the Brady Bill in 1994.
20 Years: Richard Mack's total law enforcement experience (12 years as a cop/detective, 8 years as Sheriff).
To-Do / Next Steps
Citizens are urged to join the CSPOA Posse to receive training on how to effectively work with their local sheriffs.
Listeners can purchase a fundraising bundle (Challenge Coin, Silver Peace Dollar, and the Supreme Court case booklet) for a $100 donation at cspoa.org.
Voters must aggressively question candidates about their knowledge of the Constitution's foundational texts (Creation, We the People, Article IV Section 4) before casting a vote.
Law enforcement officers currently on probation are advised to continue writing tickets to protect their jobs, but to let their conscience guide them once off probation.
Conclusion
The broadcast concludes that the battle for liberty is not against external enemies but stems from internal apathy and a lack of constitutional knowledge. Sheriff Mack and Bradlee Dean emphasize that freedom requires eternal vigilance and that citizens must hold their "servants" in government accountable to the supreme law of the land.
