Re: THE TRANSFER OF POLITICAL POWER
By: Robert Alford Darby
Date: 7/1/2008, 6:20 pm
In Response To: THE TRANSFER OF POLITICAL POWER (Robert Alford Darby)
Sometimes, when I send my articles to the media I add something not in my TNT Post. Here is such an instance.
THE TRANSFER OF POLITICAL POWER
George W. &#$@!?% Genius
By S. C. Gwynne, Texas Monthly (March 2003)
THE REPUBLICANIZATION OF TEXAS
A Stunning Transfer of Political Power
To Understand the Process of Change of Power from the Democratic Party
to the Republican Party Enroll Yourself in the Undergraduate Course
Political Strategy 101A
The Process of Change in Contemporary U.S. Political History
This is a self study course.
Assignments include the following required reading: 1. Genius, Texas
Monthly (March 2003)
2. The Tragedy of American Compassion, by Marvin Olasky
3. The Dream and the Nightmare, by Myron Magnet
The Final Examination is in three parts.
Part A. Write a three paragraph one hundred word summary of The Process
of Transferring Political Power
Part B. List the names of the members of The Iron Triangle mentioned in the Texas Monthly article and match the name of each member with one of the following titles.
1. Political Consultant. 2. White House Chief of Staff. 3. White House
Director of Communications.
Part C. True or False, The following phrase is contained in the Texas Monthly article Genius. The height of arrogance, one more arrogant power grab.
Circle T for True or F for False.
Having now completed the course, do you understand the really big power grab part of the title I gave my essay which can be found at BBS Radio, Trusted News Trader and Extreme News Posts?
The Passage of Nibiru, the Pact of Silence and the Really Big Power Grab
A Stunning Transfer of Political Power Robert Darby <email@example.com> ViewMonday, June 30, 2008 4:57:17 PMTo:Associated Press <firstname.lastname@example.org>; USA Today <email@example.com>; George Noory <firstname.lastname@example.org>; News Max <email@example.com>; Ottawa Citizen <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Larry King <email@example.com>; Bruce Dumont <BTBTALK@aol.com>; Ottawa Sun <firstname.lastname@example.org>; People Weekly <email@example.com>; Headline News <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Hillary Rodham Clinton <Senator@clinton.senate.gov>; Ian Punnett <email@example.com>; President George W. Bush <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Rep. Nancy Pelosi <email@example.com>; Postmaster@naturalsolutionsradio.com; Nancy Pelosi <AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov>; National Council of Churches <firstname.lastname@example.org>; US Conference of Catholic Bishops <email@example.com>
Cc:Nancy Lieder <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Donald Newsom <email@example.com>
I am forwarding this article to you hoping you will share it with you subscribers, audience, friends and relatives and invite them to respond by forwarding it to the Governor of their state of residence and all other legislators acting as their elected or appointed governmental representatives.
This BBS Radio TNT posting is forwarded to you by Robert A. Darby, 5121 Anchorage Avenue, El Paso, TX 79924 (915) 755-7074
If you do not desire to receive future E-mail from me please tell me that by E-mail.
The methods used in the acquisition of political power by candidates for public office should be of interest to and understood by every sane citizen of voting age. Now, at this time when the transfer of presidential power looms again, understanding the past may help understand the present and understanding may cause voters to examine carefully the campaigns tactics of candidates they are considering as their candidate for an elective office; the acquisition of political power sometimes, if not always, is by craft and stealth and, perhaps, dirty tricks and fair play may go by the wayside.
FROM WIKIPEDIA, THE FREE ENCYLOPEDIA
For freedom of speech in specific jurisdictions, see Freedom of speech by country.
For other uses, see Freedom of speech (disambiguation).
Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak without censorship and/or limitation. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes used to indicate not only freedom of verbal speech but any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, such as on "hate speech".
The right to freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The ICCPR recognizes the right to freedom of speech as "the right to hold opinions without interference. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression". Furthermore freedom of speech is recognized in European, inter-American and African regional human rights law.
It is different from and not to be confused with the concept of freedom of thought.
So, who is it at Google that limits expression of thought and speech?