I knew it is 'trespassing borderlines' and could easily be mistaken the way I signaled my mental help for a bright shining not-so-lone star from Texas.
Again, Drummy, it has nothing to do with you.
And is in no way an attempt to influence with whom you take sides with in a critical woman-to-woman issue where I allowed myself to throw a spotlight to the forum competition.
You hit a sore spot with me?
No you didn't. You just pushed the button for the material I had already researched, you just offered the hook to hang it on. Neither did the not-so-lone star from Texas hit a sore spot with me but certainly, plain to see, peed into the rattle snakes' pithole, again.
For me it's the character of a person, the ethic values, the good-will and the sincerity that comes first of all. It's not even secondary if a person is male or female or transe or homo,
or if a person is black or white or yellow or red skinned though I know some of the main differences.
IMHO a sly call for solidarity (not by you) with the pseudo-feminine types like Valerie Solanas hits the resentment that certain women have.
Could it be that women are more misled and misused by the leading figures of their own gender?
Could it be that the females' name calling and fingerpointing to the other gender namely the male one is a trick to dis-tract to the false direction?
Are vagina-whorehouses in general led by
men or by women?
Are the richest families ruled by men or by women?
Is the educational system dominated by men or by women?
This list could be continued several pages long.
An uterus does not raise women high above men to free ride like wannabe goddesses!
The scientific facts are IN SYNC with the Bible's story about the creation of mankind:
XX can only create XX or maybe XXX
XY can create XX or XY or XXY or XYY
so much to be said
as to the Valerian Solanium Shat
Drummy I wish you all the best for the coming week, good luck, successful treatment and healthy recovery for body and soul.